reputation

Twitter Search is undergoing some interesting changes under the direction of Santosh Jayaram the former VP of Search Quality at Google. The most exciting change is that Twitter is going to start crawling the content of links posted to index the content of the destination pages as well as the text in the tweet. They are also looking at my suggestion about ranking results based on the reputation & relevance of users. Twitter Search will also get a reputation ranking system soon, Jayaram told me. When you do a search on a “trending” topic (a topic that is so big it gets its own link in the Twitter.com sidebar), Twitter will take into account the reputation of the person who wrote each tweet and rank search results in part based on that. We’ve always known that search is key to Twitters revenue and these changes would probably make it the second most important search tool after Google. That’s massive. You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day – simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed . Read some similar posts Follow me on Twitter Join Twitter now or regret it forever 4 Awesome New SEO Jobs Twitter has a serious duplicate content problem Twitter isn’t selling links Published in: Search | | | | |

We are pleased to announce that a new free service called WikiAlarm.com launches today! Journalists and bloggers are sourcing information from Wikipedia every day and yet the information on pages about companies is often added by somebody totally unconnected with the brand. Imagine if your competitor was to edit your Wikipedia page to say your company had been involved in some kind of illegal activity. What if this information wasn’t spotted for months? Most large brands, celebrities & politicians have Wikipedia pages and until now there hasn’t been a way to easily monitor changes to these pages. Wiki Circularity Interestingly Ali G was the first victim of wiki circularity. A phrase first used by Will Critchlow from Distilled Wiki Circularity is the “self fulfilling prophecy” of the Web 2.0 world and works as follows: A competitor or upset former customer edits your Wikipedia page to say something bad about your company. Left unedited for a few weeks the information is picked up by a lazy blogger or journalist doing research for a story. The story then appears on a well known blog or website & the author doesn’t mention they researched the story on Wikipedia When you find the inaccurate article and try to edit the information on Wikipedia you find that the Wiki moderators refuse to remove it To add insult to injury the Wikipedia page is updated to include a link referencing the inaccurate blog or newspaper article Wikipedia editors normally rely on the reputation and accuracy of the media when they are deciding on the content of a page. This becomes a big problem when journalists and bloggers are using Wikipedia to research stories. Sign up to WikiAlarm.com today and protect your brand on Wikipedia You can get our blog posts delivered for free by email every day – simply add your email address to the box below or alternatively grab the RSS feed . Read some similar posts Papering over the cracks with rel=canonical Why the Million dollar Wiki is a bad idea First Day of Summer 21 June – Find out more Blogicon Wordpress beta testers required Blogicon.org – a self hosted avatar for your blog Published in: Social Media | | | | |